Greedy Associates - Greedy IP Board

Re: Collection / retainer issue

Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:05:30 PST

This was once proposed to me when I was a client. I said no.

Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:13:17 PST

A good reason to use an evergreen retainer agreement. As an

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:32 PST

We ran into a similar collections issue recently - I was tak

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:19:38 PST

Sounds like you were quite the master at gaming the system.

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:22:58 PST

At least you got a year's worth of billing before the wr

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:14:07 PST

Hypo: A client of your firm has a reasonably active pro

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:53:13 PST

Based on my experiences as an examiner and from having dealt

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:07:15 PST

That was it, thanks. I knew I had read that the examiners go

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:29:11 PST

Examiners do not receive a "count" for interviews.

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:18:57 PST

"Counts for interviews. Hmmm - anyone else getting unsol

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:03:05 PST

Yes. I don't know why there would be a shift from RCEs t

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:11:54 PST

I believe that PTO management was hoping that the reduction

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:17:52 PST

What does the PTO really gain by reducing counts for RCEs wh

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:45:08 PST

I file a lot of Appeal Briefs for a client which chooses not

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:11:20 PST

My guess is no, there is no such continuing duty. Recall th