<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>U.S. Eleventh Circuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009-03-31:/eleventh_circuit/32</id>
    <updated>2009-07-03T00:04:20Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The FindLaw 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries Blog</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.24-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 08-13733</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/07/mesa-air-group-inc-v-delta-air-lines-inc-no-08-13733.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2237</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T22:34:02Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-03T00:04:20Z</updated>

    <summary>In an action seeking an injunction prohibiting Defendant airline from terminating its regional connection agreement with Plaintiff airline, an injunction in favor of Plaintiff is affirmed where Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on its claim that Defendant was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Contract Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgeanderson" label="Circuit Judge ANDERSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgecudahy" label="Circuit Judge Cudahy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgemarcus" label="Circuit Judge MARCUS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="contractlaw" label="Contract Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="deltaairlinesinc" label="Delta Air Lines Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mesaairgroupinc" label="Mesa Air Group Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In an action seeking an injunction prohibiting Defendant airline from terminating its regional connection agreement with Plaintiff airline, an injunction in favor of Plaintiff is affirmed where Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on its claim that Defendant was equitably estopped from terminating the agreement.</p>
<p><a title="Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 08-13733 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0813733p.pdf">Read Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 08-13733</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>July 1, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Cudahy</p>
<p>7ksrqu5dnv</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thomas v. Carnival Corp., No. 08-10613</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/07/thomas-v-carnival-corp-no-08-10613.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2233</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T22:29:46Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T22:29:46Z</updated>

    <summary>In a personal injury action involving a slip and fall aboard Defendant cruise line, the District Court&apos;s order granting Defendant&apos;s motion to compel arbitration is reversed where, under the parties&apos; agreement, the dispute at issue must have some actual relation...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Contract Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Injury &amp; Tort Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="carnivalcorp" label="Carnival Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgebarkett" label="Circuit Judge Barkett" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgefay" label="Circuit Judge Fay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="districtjudgetrager" label="District Judge Trager" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="injuryandtortlaw" label="INJURY AND TORT LAW" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a personal injury action involving a slip and fall aboard Defendant cruise line, the District Court's order granting Defendant's motion to compel arbitration is reversed where, under the parties' agreement, the dispute at issue must have some actual relation to the agreement to arbitrate, irrespective of what ship the claims originated from and when suit was brought.&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0810613p.pdf" title="Thomas v. Carnival Corp., No. 08-10613 - full decision">Read Thomas v. Carnival Corp., No. 08-10613</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed July 1, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Per Curiam</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Moran, No. 08-16987</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/07/us-v-moran-no-08-16987.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2232</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T22:27:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T22:27:36Z</updated>

    <summary>In a firearm possession prosecution, the District Court&apos;s order setting the terms of Defendant&apos;s supervised release is affirmed where a defendant is not entitled to notice before a District Court may impose special conditions of supervised release to address a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebirch" label="Circuit Judge Birch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgehull" label="Circuit Judge Hull" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgepryor" label="Circuit Judge PRYOR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sentencing" label="Sentencing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a firearm possession prosecution, the District Court's order setting the terms of Defendant's supervised release is affirmed where a defendant is not entitled to notice before a District Court may impose special conditions of supervised release to address a defendant's proclivity to sexual misconduct when the crime of conviction did not involve sexual activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0816987p.pdf" title="US v. Moran, No. 08-16987 - full decision">Read US v. Moran, No. 08-16987</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed July 1, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Pryor</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Zhang v. Holder, No. 08-15245</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/zhang-v-holder-no-08-15245.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2204</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T00:14:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T00:14:50Z</updated>

    <summary>Petitioner&apos;s petition for review of the BIA&apos;s denial of her motion to reopen her removal proceedings is granted, where Petitioner was exempt from the 90-day filing deadline for moving to reopen because she presented sufficient evidence of changed country conditions....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Immigration Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebarkett" label="Circuit Judge Barkett" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgefay" label="Circuit Judge Fay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgewilson" label="Circuit Judge WILSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="immigrationlaw" label="Immigration Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Petitioner's petition for review of the BIA's denial of her motion to reopen her removal proceedings is granted, where Petitioner was exempt from the 90-day filing deadline for moving to reopen because she presented sufficient evidence of changed country conditions.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0815245p.pdf" title="Zhang v. Holder, No. 08-15245 - full decision">Read Zhang v. Holder, No. 08-15245</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Per Curiam</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown &amp; Root Serv., Inc., No. 08-14487</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/carmichael-v-kellogg-brown-root-serv-inc-no-08-14487.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2203</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T00:12:43Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T00:12:43Z</updated>

    <summary>In a negligence suit arising out of an accident in which Plaintiff&apos;s husband was injured while serving in Iraq, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the political question doctrine barred the suit because adjudicating Plaintiff&apos;s claims would require...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Injury &amp; Tort Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgeanderson" label="Circuit Judge ANDERSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgekravitch" label="Circuit Judge KRAVITCH" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgemarcus" label="Circuit Judge MARCUS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="injuryandtortlaw" label="INJURY AND TORT LAW" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a negligence suit arising out of an accident in which Plaintiff's husband was injured while serving in Iraq, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the political question doctrine barred the suit because adjudicating Plaintiff's claims would require extensive reexamination and second-guessing of many sensitive judgments surrounding the conduct of a military convoy in war time.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0814487p.pdf" title="Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown &amp; Root Serv., Inc., No. 08-14487 - full decision">Read Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown &amp; Root Serv., Inc., No. 08-14487</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Marcus</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Smith v. Sec&apos;y, Dept. of Corr., No. 07-14173</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/smith-v-secy-dept-of-corr-no-07-14173.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2201</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T00:10:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T00:10:19Z</updated>

    <summary>In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner&apos;s petition is affirmed in part, where there was no possibility of prejudice due to the prosecutor&apos;s alleged misconduct in a prior trial because a new trial was conducted; but reversed in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgecarnes" label="Circuit Judge CARNES" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgedubina" label="Circuit Judge Dubina" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgehull" label="Circuit Judge Hull" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner's petition is affirmed in part, where there was no possibility of prejudice due to the prosecutor's alleged misconduct in a prior trial because a new trial was conducted; but reversed in part, where the prosecution did not disclose in the later trial that a witness told the prosecutor that in exchange for testifying again, he wanted help with charges he faced.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0714173p.pdf" title="Smith v. Sec'y, Dept. of Corr., No. 07-14173 - full decision">Read Smith v. Sec'y, Dept. of Corr., No. 07-14173</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Carnes</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Gari, No. 08-10014</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/us-v-gari-no-08-10014.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2200</id>

    <published>2009-07-01T00:08:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-01T00:08:23Z</updated>

    <summary>Defendants&apos; alien smuggling convictions are affirmed in part, where the I-213 forms admitted by the District Court did not contain statements harmful to the defense; but reversed in part, where the evidence at trial did not establish that Defendants lacked...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Immigration Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgeblack" label="Circuit Judge Black" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgecox" label="Circuit Judge Cox" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgetjoflat" label="Circuit Judge TJOFLAT" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="immigrationlaw" label="Immigration Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Defendants' alien smuggling convictions are affirmed in part, where the I-213 forms admitted by the District Court did not contain statements harmful to the defense; but reversed in part, where the evidence at trial did not establish that Defendants lacked prior authorization to enter the United States.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0810014p.pdf" title="US v. Gari, No. 08-10014 - full decision">Read US v. Gari, No. 08-10014</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Cox</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Tagg, No. 08-16860</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/us-v-tagg-no-08-16860.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2181</id>

    <published>2009-06-30T21:38:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-30T21:38:36Z</updated>

    <summary>Defendant&apos;s firearm possession conviction is affirmed where there was sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable jury to conclude that Defendant intentionally facilitated his co-conspirators&apos; unlawful possession of pipe bombs. Read US v. Tagg, No. 08-16860 Appellate Information Filed June 30,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgefay" label="Circuit Judge Fay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgehull" label="Circuit Judge Hull" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgepryor" label="Circuit Judge PRYOR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Defendant's firearm possession conviction is affirmed where there was sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable jury to conclude that Defendant intentionally facilitated his co-conspirators' unlawful possession of pipe bombs.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0816860p.pdf" title="US v. Tagg, No. 08-16860 - full decision">Read US v. Tagg, No. 08-16860</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Fay</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thomas v. US, No. 06-15651</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/thomas-v-us-no-06-15651.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2180</id>

    <published>2009-06-30T21:36:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-30T21:36:18Z</updated>

    <summary>In a drug prosecution, the dismissal of Petitioner&apos;s habeas petition is reversed, where the law of the case doctrine did not operate to bar, by necessary implication, the claims of ineffective assistance that Petitioner sought to raise. Read Thomas v....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgeanderson" label="Circuit Judge ANDERSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgegoldberg" label="Circuit Judge Goldberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgewilson" label="Circuit Judge WILSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="habeascorpus" label="Habeas Corpus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a drug prosecution, the dismissal of Petitioner's habeas petition is reversed, where the law of the case doctrine did not operate to bar, by necessary implication, the claims of ineffective assistance that Petitioner sought to raise.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0615651p.pdf" title="Thomas v. US, No. 06-15651 - full decision">Read Thomas v. US, No. 06-15651</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Wilson</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Burger King Corp. v. E-Z Eating, 41 Corp., No. 08-15078</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/burger-king-corp-v-e-z-eating-41-corp-no-08-15078.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2179</id>

    <published>2009-06-30T21:21:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-30T21:21:24Z</updated>

    <summary>In an action claiming that Defendant fast food franchisor violated an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in failing to grant Plaintiffs an exception to a system-wide &quot;value menu&quot; program, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Plaintiffs...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Contract Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebarkett" label="Circuit Judge Barkett" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgefay" label="Circuit Judge Fay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="contractlaw" label="Contract Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="districtjudgetrager" label="District Judge Trager" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="franchiselaw" label="Franchise Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In an action claiming that Defendant fast food franchisor violated an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in failing to grant Plaintiffs an exception to a system-wide "value menu" program, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Plaintiffs failed to properly request an exception.</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0815078p.pdf" title="Burger King Corp. v. E-Z Eating, 41 Corp., No. 08-15078 - full decision">Read Burger King Corp. v. E-Z Eating, 41 Corp., No. 08-15078</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 30, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Fay</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Flores, No. 08-10775</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/us-v-flores-no-08-10775.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2135</id>

    <published>2009-06-29T21:39:58Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T22:06:06Z</updated>

    <summary>Defendants&apos; RICO convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the District Court did not err in dismissing a juror for cause, because the court was not required to inquire further into the juror&apos;s alleged medical condition; and 2) there is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgeanderson" label="Circuit Judge ANDERSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgekravitch" label="Circuit Judge KRAVITCH" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgewilson" label="Circuit Judge WILSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sentencing" label="Sentencing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Defendants' RICO convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the District Court did not err in dismissing a juror for cause, because the court was not required to inquire further into the juror's alleged medical condition; and 2) there is no evidence that another dismissed juror's statements prejudiced the venire.</p>
<p><a title="US v. Flores, No. 08-10775 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0810775p.pdf">Read US v. Flores, No. 08-10775</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 29, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Per Curiam</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Doorbal v. Dept. of Corr., No. 08-15869</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/doorbal-v-dept-of-corr-no-08-15869.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2132</id>

    <published>2009-06-29T21:37:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T22:07:29Z</updated>

    <summary>In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner&apos;s petition is affirmed where Petitioner&apos;s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was barred from federal review because the state supreme court had applied a state rule of procedure to refuse to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebirch" label="Circuit Judge Birch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgeblack" label="Circuit Judge Black" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgepryor" label="Circuit Judge PRYOR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="habeascorpus" label="Habeas Corpus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner's petition is affirmed where Petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was barred from federal review because the state supreme court had applied a state rule of procedure to refuse to adjudicate his claim on collateral review.</p>
<p><a title="Doorbal v. Dept. of Corr., No. 08-15869 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0815869p.pdf">Read Doorbal v. Dept. of Corr., No. 08-15869</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 29, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Pryor</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Barner, No. 08-10080</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/us-v-barner-no-08-10080.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2131</id>

    <published>2009-06-29T21:32:49Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T22:06:51Z</updated>

    <summary>Defendant&apos;s drug possession conviction is affirmed where the police were not required to supply Defendant in the course of his interrogation with a flow of information to help him calibrate his self-interest in deciding whether to speak. Sentence is reversed...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebarkett" label="Circuit Judge Barkett" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgebirch" label="Circuit Judge Birch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="districtjudgekorman" label="District Judge Korman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Defendant's drug possession conviction is affirmed where the police were not required to supply Defendant in the course of his interrogation with a flow of information to help him calibrate his self-interest in deciding whether to speak. Sentence is reversed where, because the District Judge chose to sentence within the Guidelines, an error in the calculation could not be harmless.</p>
<p><a title="US v. Barner, No. 08-10080 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0810080p.pdf">Read US v. Barner, No. 08-10080</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 29, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Korman</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US v. Wilk, No. 07-14176</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/us-v-wilk-no-07-14176.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2117</id>

    <published>2009-06-29T20:02:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T20:45:29Z</updated>

    <summary>Defendant&apos;s murder conviction is affirmed where: 1) evidence regarding whether the arresting officers used proper police procedures in entering Defendant&apos;s home was irrelevant to his claim that the killing was in self-defense; and 2) any possible error in the District...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Criminal Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgebirch" label="Circuit Judge Birch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgedubina" label="Circuit Judge Dubina" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgewilson" label="Circuit Judge WILSON" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="criminallawampprocedure" label="<![CDATA[CRIMINAL LAW &amp; PROCEDURE]]>" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Defendant's murder conviction is affirmed where: 1) evidence regarding whether the arresting officers used proper police procedures in entering Defendant's home was irrelevant to his claim that the killing was in self-defense; and 2) any possible error in the District Court's instructions was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence against Defendant.</p>
<p><a title="US v. Wilk, No. 07-14176 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0714176p.pdf">Read US v. Wilk, No. 07-14176</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 29, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Opinion by Judge Wilson</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Citizens for Police Accountability Pol. Comm. v. Browning, No. 08-15115</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2009/06/citizens-for-police-accountability-pol-comm-v-browning-no-08-15115.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.findlaw.com,2009:/eleventh_circuit//32.2064</id>

    <published>2009-06-25T23:54:20Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-26T00:08:16Z</updated>

    <summary>In a First Amendment challenge to a state statute banning the solicitation of voters within 100 feet of the entrance to any polling place, the District Court&apos;s injunction against enforcement of the statute is reversed, where the state had a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Edgar</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Civil Rights Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="circuitjudgedubina" label="Circuit Judge Dubina" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgeedmonson" label="Circuit Judge Edmonson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="circuitjudgehill" label="Circuit Judge Hill" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="citizensforpoliceaccountability" label="Citizens for Police Accountability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="civilrightslaw" label="Civil Rights Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="constitutionallaw" label="Constitutional Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="electionlaw" label="Election law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="firstamendment" label="First Amendment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a First Amendment challenge to a state statute banning the solicitation of voters within 100 feet of the entrance to any polling place, the District Court's injunction against enforcement of the statute is reversed, where the state had a compelling interest in prohibiting the intimidation and confusion of the electorate.</p>
<p><a title="Citizens for Police Accountability Pol. Comm. v. Browning, No. 08-15115 - full decision" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0815115p.pdf">Read Citizens for Police Accountability Pol. Comm. v. Browning, No. 08-15115</a></p>
<p><u>Appellate Information</u></p>
<p>Filed June 25, 2009</p>
<p><u>Judges</u></p>
<p>Per Curiam</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
